安乐死_英语辩论
2020-03-02 05:45:51 来源：范文大全收藏下载本文
(!)Euthanasia is to kill people.Life is so important for every one.People don’t only live for themselves, but they also live for their families and the society.If they choose to leave the world, they are not responsible for themselves, their families and the society.Euthanasia is disparagement of life.Life is so precious.Patients should cherish their life.They should try their best to prevail incurable disease.Everyone should show basic respect for life.No matter what happens, we should face up to the facts, we should live on with great courage, we should believe in wonder.Nothing is impoible.so we view that Euthanasia should not be legeled(!) Euthanasia stops the medicine developing.If the patients require using euthanasia, doctors won’t try their best to save patients.The medicine will stop progre.If making euthanasia is made legal, patients who use euthanasia will be protected by law.The doctors’ right will be obvious.Doctors are given too much power, and can be wrong or unethical.Patients put their faith and trust in the opinions of their doctor.people abuse euthanasia when it is legalized, it can harm people lives.In the name of euthanasia, carry out committing suicide.Miracle cures or recoveries can occur.You can never underestimate the power of the human spirit.It demeans the value of human life.In this country, human life means something.It could open the floodgates to non-critical patient suicides and other abuses.Any loosening of the aisted-suicide laws could eventually lead to abuses of the privilege.Many religions prohibit suicide and the intentional killing of others.The most basic commandment is \"You shall not kill\".Insurance companies may put undue preure on doctors to avoid heroic measures or recommend the aisted-suicide procedure.Health insurance providers are under tremendous preure to keep premiums down.Euthanasia can become a means of health care cost containment..Physicians and other medical care people should not be involved in directly causing death.Mercy killing is morally incorrect and should be forbidden by law.It\'s a homicide and murdering another human cannot be rationalized under any circumstances.Human life deserves exceptional security and protection.Advanced medical technology has made it poible to enhance human life span and quality of life.Palliative care and rehabilitation centers are better alternatives to help disabled or patients approaching death live a pain-free and better life.Family members influencing the patient\'s decision into euthanasia for personal gains like wealth inheritance is another iue.There is no way you can be really sure if the decision towards aisted suicide is voluntary or forced by others.Mercy killing would cause decline in medical care and cause victimization of the most vulnerable society.Would mercy killing transform itself from the \"right to die\" to \"right to kill\"? How would one ae whether a disorder of mental nature qualifies mercy killing? What if the pain threshold is below optimum and the patient perceives the circumstances to be not worthy of living? How would one know whether the wish to die is the result of unbalanced thought proce or a logical decision in mentally ill patients? What if the individual chooses aisted suicide as an option and the family wouldn\'t agree? As to face the parting, helplene, lo of self-control, fear of death and sorrow and so the majority of patients will experience mental suffering.In this psychological requirement under the \"Euthanasia\", we can say that he is reasonable? \"According to the study of suicide, suicide and treatable mental illne is intrinsically related, but not the fatal disease, a study found that in 44 patients with advanced cancer, only three thought about suicide, but are there is a serious depreion.Another study shows that 85 suicides, only one person suffering from terminal illne, and 90-100% of the suicides were suffering from obvious mental illne.Undeniably, the modern medical practice slow death proce, often cited the lo of personal characteristics of patients Mei, dignity, independence and autonomy.However, the expreion of active euthanasia as acts of personal autonomy, it is wrong.Reasons: (a) Since active euthanasia need help, then it is not an individual matter, but the open or in the public thing.(B) under the public recognition to self-defense, capital punishment and justice in the form of war, murder, only to defend the life for everyone, not to the benefit of those killed.So, even if death is painful relief, can not be lightly taken away the right to life committed to personal.(C) even if the person\'s self-determination recognized the right to choose to die, that does not mean the right to ask others to kill themselves, does not include the right to authorize self to kill others.(D) autonomy, including the right of slavery has never been their own, in other words, the right to freedom does not mean the right not to freedom.So to maintain the autonomy, the need to protect life, to give others their right to life is not trampling the principle of maintaining independence.Therefore, individual autonomy and social need and public objectives and values to be consistent.
结尾active euthanasia may gradually lose its spontaneity, and thus out of (i) \"secret euthanasia\", meaning that without their own consent, to be a doctor euthanized.(Ii) \"forced euthanasia\", meaning patients suffering from terminal illne would be coercion to lure choose euthanasia to relieve their families in the economic and psychological preures, and save limited resources of society, the patients chose to die, do not feel life is a burden or tired of life, but he felt the burden of someone else, and that others dislike.(Iii) \"Deputy euthanasia\" means to allow patients who lack capacity to self-determination by the people \"proxy decision\" to euthanasia.(Iv) \"Discrimination against euthanasia,\" the crisis is the number of types of patients such as the poverty stricken or belonging to ethnic minorities, may be \"clever\" to force that \"euthanasia\" requirement, the mercy of others.Made ill patients caught in the dilemma of both the opposition between the yield, resulting in additional unneceary fear and anxiety.The information may be heard: \"Death is terrible! Your best choice of euthanasia.\" of the slip waves, is once the \"euthanasia\" is legalized, its use will inevitably extend to other types of patients but not the dying, if not cure patients, but not incurable disease, then the risk of Alzheimer\'s disease or brain degradation, even those born with severe disabilities Down syndrome baby..And so on.So, if this argument, once established, will only create panic and fear that they will be forcibly sent to \"euthanasia\" in the ranks.Therefore, I agree Frasen say, \"human life, merely the poibility of error, is enough to completely reject the\" euthanasia.\" \" Euthanasia is humane because it helps to hasten the death of terminally ill patient.Death, as natural as birth, is sometimes a hard proce that requires aistance, and euthanasia is part of such aistance.People have the right to die.It is unneceary to maintain life artificially beyond the point when people will never regain consciousne.Extending an incurably ill patient’s life means the same as aggravating his pain.Efforts should not be made to perpetuate what has become a meaningle existence. Euthanasia can bring mental and physical release to the patient and his family when he is terminally ill and has no prospect of recovering.Mercy killing is motivated by nothing but love and sympathy for the dying patient.Most of the terminally ill patients themselves want to die with dignity and peace instead of agony and degradation.Medical treatment for a comatose patient cause great burden economically for the hospital and the patient’s family.
It is inhumane to perform euthanasia no matter how painle the proce is.Anyone who voluntarily, knowingly or premeditatedly takes the life of another, even one minute prior to death, is a killer.Euthanasia is a criminal offense because it involves the killing of a person.Legalized euthanasia will invite abuse of human life because any form of murder many be conveniently dubbed “mercy killing ”by unscrupulous people.
Euthanasia raises many moral iues since it implies that active measures are taken to terminate human life.
Doctors and nurses should do everything they can to save dying patients instead of hastening their death by active measures.The instinct for self-preservation is the strongest instinct that human beings poe.It is untrue that any patient himself should want to die.Doctors and nurses involved in euthanasia have discredited their profeion, for euthanasia is a violation of the fundamental medical principle to save human life.Mercy killing is one of the most controversial iues in the world of medicine.As the picture given above depicts, A late sick mother desperately ill son request for euthanasia.But the son was cut for this。 feeling helple because he is at a lo what to do about it.
The picture really sets me thinking.It implies that people differ in their attitudes towards the mercy killing .Some people think it is right.but others dont think so.now let us listen to everyone\'s different opinions 安乐死是医学界最有争议的问题之一。正如上面所示的视频所描绘的，一位晚期患病母亲病入膏肓，请求儿子实施安乐死。但儿子且为此获罪，感到无能为力，因为他们不知道该怎么办。这幅画确实发人深省。它暗示，人们在对待安乐死上看法不一致。有些人认为他是对的，但其他的不这样认为，现在让我们听听大家的不同观点
赞成
1.If a person loses the survivability of the community has not contributed to lose the meaning of life.reduce reliance on others and a burden on society.如果一个人失去了生存能力，对社会没有了贡献，也就失去了生命的意义，减少对别人的倚赖和对社会的负担。
2.the complete elimination of euthanasia patients can be painful diseases, mental stre and depreion thinking exists.安乐死可以彻底消除病人的疾病痛苦，精神压力和思想懮愁
3.a person bound to die sooner or later die; One hundred dead, the living dead are free, patients and relatives reflex happy 人总难免一死，早晚都是死；一死百了，死人活人都解脱，患者与亲朋皆大欢
4.the lives of their own people, individuals have the right to end their lives, which is opposed to the human rights and personal freedom.人的生命属于自己，个人有权结束生命，这是个人自由和独享的人权
5.we believe that euthanasia is a form of respect for life.安乐死是尊重生命的一种方式。
6.首先，从主观方面来讲，安乐死对于病人自身，是一种减少生命痛苦的方式。人，总是趋利避害的，没有人会说“我要去寻找痛苦，我要去远离快乐”。当一个人处于精神和躯体的极端痛苦之下，当生命的存在已成为一场噩梦，我们难道还要 提及道德和伦理吗？生存这个基本的“长度”都已经不能够维持，还要来谈及生命的宽度，还要去顾及伦理的重量吗？
First,from a subjective point of view.Euthanasia for the patients themselves, is a way to reduce human suffering.People always seek advantages and avoid disadvantages, and no one would say, \"I am going to look painful, I had to go far from happy.\"When a person is under extreme suffering in the body and the spirit, when the very existence of life has become a nightmare.Should we mention the moral and ethical?The basic survival of the \"length\" are not able to maintain, but also to talk about the breadth of life,we still have to take into account the weight of ethics?
7.We feel this suffering, we have come with this then you have no choice in the circumstances, we have chosen euthanasia.This is not contempt for life, nor is it moral decline.Instead, it was a time in the lives of torment and suffering to the loved ones around us to the people we love.more acceptable alternative to the road.Therefore, we believe that euthanasia is a form of respect for life.我们感受着这种痛苦，我们体会着这个中滋味，在无法选择的情况下，我们选择了安乐死。这不是对生命的藐视，也不是道德的沦丧。反而，这是一种
在生命面临煎熬和磨难的时候，为我们身边的亲人，为我们爱着的人，选择另一条更容易接受的道路。因此，我方认为，安乐死是尊重生命的一种方式.
反对
1.Euthanasia is a rejection of the importance and value of human life 安乐死是拒绝了人类生活的意义和价值
2，\"euthanasia\" if legal form confirm down, may be some people use to depriving the life of others.In addition, to the understanding of the disease in humans is still very limited circumstances, without legal license and others end life, contrary to the right to live moral principles.“安乐死”如果以法律形式确认下来，可能会被一些人利用，用以非法剥夺他人的生命。另外，在人类对疾病的认识还十分有限的情况下，未经法律许可而结束他人生命，有悖于生存权利的道德准则。
3.Oppose euthanasia people have argued that the euthanasia is a violation of the laws of nature and death against natural behavior, weaken the human overcome the disaster of the strength and courage.反对安乐死合法化的人士则认为，安乐死是违反生老病死自然规律的反自然行为，削弱了人类战胜灾难的力量和勇气。
4.Euthanasia is disguised violations of the right to life 安乐死是变相侵害生命权
人人范文网 m.inrrp.com.cn 手机版