商务英语演讲学生评价老师
2020-03-03 22:04:10 来源：范文大全收藏下载本文
PR Students at universities often have a choice of places to live.They may choose to live in university dormitories, or they may choose to live apartments in the community.Compare the advantages of living in university housing with the advantages of living in an apartment in the community.Where would you prefer to live? Give reasons for your preference.
I think it’s better for college students to live on-campus their first two years, and then move into an apartment off-campus life, while juniors and seniors need the independence of off-campus life.Students’ needs change over four years, so their housing should too.
Living on-campus makes it easier to get oriented to the way things are done.You get the whole university experience.Plus, you interact more with other students.This includes not only your roommates, but everyone in your dormitory.The older students in the dormitory can be a big help for the new students.Keeping up with studies your first year is hard enough.You shouldn’t have to worry about finding your way around and figuring out the university bureaucracy.
Living in the dormitory also makes a student feel more a part of the university community.There are more opportunities for becoming involved in university activities and networking with students and university administration.
Living off-campus, however, is a definite advantage for older students.Finding an apartment, dealing with leases and the landlord’s regulations, cooking meals, and figuring out budgets are all good practice for life after graduation.This kind of independence helps older students grow in adulthood.
Off-campus housing also gives students a better perspective on what’s going on around them.Campuses can be like little worlds of their own.There are few children or older people and everyone is focused on education.Getting to know neighbors who aren’t students is good for students coming from different places.It’s a chance to find out what other people think and feel.
I think a combination of two years on-campus and two years off-campus is a winning combination for most students.Schools should ask students to evaluate their teachers.Do you agree or disagree?Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.Teachers have a very difficult job in society.They not only have to learn how to teach material effectively,but also must learn how to deal with a wide variety of personalities.While teaching is a difficult job,I think it is important for schools to ask students to evaluate their teachers.I think this is the right thing to do because it encourages teachers to try their best, it gives students the opportunity to choose effective teachers,and it allows the schools to have the best teachers poible teaching.If a teacher knows that at the end of the term, the students will be evaluating his/her work,then the teacher will be driven to do a very good job.If there is no preure from evaluation,a teacher might be prone to doing a le than perfect job.I believe that everyone needs an occasional evaluation to ensure they are doing their job correctly.In the case of a teacher,the students will give the most important evaluations.If there was a public summary of which teacher scored the highest on his/her evaluations,then students would be able to take courses based on which teacher was the best at the job.This would allow students to excel in their studies,and achieve better grades.Finally,if schools ask students to evaluate their teachers,the schools themselves would be able to have the best teachers working on campus.If a teacher scored too low on an evaluation, a replacement could be found.This is a much better method than waiting for students to complain about a teacher.Teachers do have a difficult job,but regardle of this,they must excel at it.If a person is a particularly poor teacher,the students will not learn the required material,and suffer for it.For thousands of years, students acquire knowledge from teachers and teachers evaluate their students with degrees of examinations and tests.However, whether students should in return evaluate their teachers is highly controversial.Some may claim that a mutual supervising mechanism between students and teachers is better than the existed evaluation system, while others argue that students should not be granted for such right.In my opinion, I personally agree with the mutual supervising mechanism and support that students should be given the right to ae their teachers.
The most prominent reason for the merging of the question \"should students evaluate their teachers\" is the growing number of unqualified teachers entering Universities and colleges.So in the orientation of improving education quality, schools could reverse this tendency by letting students to evaluate teachers and expel those seemingly qualified but in fact unqualified teachers.By implementing the mutual supervising mechanism, students could grade teacher by criterions such as the punctuality of claes, whether teachers can fully illustrate the core concepts of the subjects or just talking about cliches, do teachers have an open mind to students\' understanding or extremely dogmatic.In general, teachers with paion and sharp understanding of the subject are often adored by students therefore will get good grade, but teachers who are lax about the course and le inspiring are not welcomed by students and therefore receive lower grades.Thus help the administration to decide which teachers are worth rewarding and who should be expelled.
However, the biggest flaw existed in the mutual supervising mechanism cannot be ignored: some students are so young and immature that they may wrongly evaluate their teachers.In really situations, teachers\' insistence on students\' punctuality or precision on experiments and homework might enrage(使厌烦) students who are not used to get to claes on time or take experiments seriously.In this case, a responsible and conscientious teacher may receive low credit from students , which is totally unfair.But fortunately, these immature students are after all the minority of the whole picture, today, most college undergraduates are sensible and rational young people who know the merits of following strict rules set up by their teachers.
In a nutshell, in oder to efficiently allocate educational resources, schools should allow students to evaluate their teachers.Not only could this improve the education quality provided to students, but also gather more resources like experiment facilities and fund to qualified teachers and help them to make advancement in their own fields.
I think it’s a good idea for schools to ask students to evaluate their teachers.This informs teachers of how students react both to their teaching methods and to them as individuals.Teachers can weigh the criticisms and change what they think needs to be changed.Praise from students is also valuable.It can reinforce teachers’ opinions about how they’re teaching and give them confidence.
It’s also helpful for school administrators to hear what students think about their teachers.It keeps administrators in touch with what’s going on in the school.It also gives them some idea of which teachers effectively reach the students.However, good administrators know that student evaluations need to be reviewed with a keen eye for prejudice and adolescent（青春期的） attitudes.After all, and evaluation is a good way for students to get back at teachers who expect more of them than they want to give.
Evaluating teachers is also a good exercise for the students.They have to organize their thoughts about what they think of their teachers.In that way, they pinpoint for themselves what they expect of those teachers.They begin to understand what they value in a teacher and what students feel as if they have a voice in what happens in their schools.It makes them feel as if they’re part of the education proce when their opinion is valued by the administration.Finally, it teaches them responsibility.
人人范文网 m.inrrp.com.cn 手机版